
Search SNP
Search Gene
Search CNV
Search Haplotype
Search Other Variant
Search Region
Search Pathway
Search Study
Study Report
Comment on Study | View All Comments on Study |
Reference | Mansour, H. A., 2006 PMID: 16507006 |
---|---|
Citation | Mansour, H. A., J. Wood, et al. (2006). "Association study of eight circadian genes with bipolar I disorder, schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia." Genes Brain Behav 5(2): 150-157. |
Disease Type | Bipolar Disorder & Schizophrenia |
Study Design | case-control and family-based |
Study Type | Candidate-gene association study |
Sample Size | Pittsburgh sample: 138 cases and 196 parents; NIMH Genetics Collaborative Initiative: 96 cases and 192 parents; 180 community-based controls; 331 US patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and 344 available parents from Pittsburgh |
SNP/Region/Marker Size | 46 SNPs |
Predominant Ethnicity | Caucasian |
Population | American |
Sample Diagnosis | DSM-IV |
---|---|
Sample Status | For Pittsburgh-based samples, individuals with BD1, SZ or SZA (DSM-IV criteria) and their available parents participated. Additional clinical information was obtained from available clinical records and from relatives. Pedigrees having probands with BD1 (DSM-IV criteria) were ascertained at Indiana University, Johns Hopkins University, Washington University and the Clinical Neurogenetics Branch of the NIMH Intramural Research Program. The DIGS was the primary interview schedule. The families were ascertained if they included two or more affected first-degree relatives. Pedigrees are sequentially extended through first-degree relatives of specific individuals with specific diagnoses. Pedigrees in which both parents of the proband have SAB (SZA, bipolar type) or BD1 are excluded. |
Technique | genotyping using multiplex PCR |
Statistical Method | Transmission distortion at individual SNPs was tested initially using the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) as implemented in the GENEHUNTER software package. To evaluate whether the genotype distribution differed significantly among individuals diagnosed with BD1 vs. the population in general, they contrasted the observed genotyped distribution for cases with the sample from neonates by using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. |
Result Summary | Modest associations with SNPs at ARNTL (BmaL1) and TIMELESS genes were observed in the BD1 samples. The associations were detected using family-based and case-control analyses, albeit with different SNPs. Associations with TIMELESS and PERIOD3 were also detected in the Pittsburgh SZ/SZA group. Thus far, evidence for association between specific SNPs at the circadian gene loci and BD1 is tentative. Additional studies using larger samples are required to evaluate the associations reported here. |
SNP | Related Gene(s) | Allele Change | Risk Allele | Statistical Values | Author Comments | Result Category |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs10462018 | PER3 | C/T | TDT P-value = 0.303 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.78 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs895682 | ARNTL | A/C | TDT P-value = 0.008, X2=7.00, df=1 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.23 for BDI | We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed t...... We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed transmission distortion of the bipolar samples jointly More... | Positive | |
rs774026 | TIMELESS | C/T | TDT P-value = 0.314 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.835 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs969486 | ARNTL | C/T | TDT P-value = 0.994 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.501 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs2291739 | TIMELESS ARHGEF5 | A/G | TDT P-value = 0.089, X2=2.89, df=1 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.812 for BDI | Another locus in TIMELESS showed substantial but not quite s...... Another locus in TIMELESS showed substantial but not quite significant transmission bias when we analyzed transmission distortion of the bipolar samples jointly. More... | Negative | |
rs2859387 | PER3 | A/G | TDT P-value = 0.803 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.039 for BDI | For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals ...... For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals from the Pittsburgh sample diagnosed with BD1 vs. the population in general, significant differences were detected. More... | Positive | |
rs2290035 | BTBD10 ARNTL | T/A | TDT P-value = 0.181 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.09 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs2291738 | TIMELESS | A/G | TDT P-value = 0.029, X2=4.73, df=1 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.328 for BDI | We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed t...... We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed transmission distortion of the bipolar samples jointly More... | Positive | |
rs4908699 | PER3 UTS2 | A/G | TDT P-value = 0.398 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.47 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs7107287 | ARNTL | G/T | TDT P-value = 0.047 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.033 for BDI | For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals ...... For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals from the Pittsburgh sample diagnosed with BD1 vs. the population in general, significant differences were detected. More... | Positive | |
rs2896635 | ARNTL | A/T | TDT P-value = 0.235 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.162 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs4757142 | ARNTL | G/A | TDT P-value = 0.597 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.0008 for BDI | For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals ...... For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals from the Pittsburgh sample diagnosed with BD1 vs. the population in general, significant differences were detected. More... | Positive | |
rs1481892 | ARNTL | C/G | TDT P-value = 0.452 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.018 for BDI | For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals ...... For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals from the Pittsburgh sample diagnosed with BD1 vs. the population in general, significant differences were detected. More... | Positive | |
rs1982350 | ARNTL | T/C | TDT P-value = 0.162 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.005 for BDI | For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals ...... For the contrasts of genotype distributions for individuals from the Pittsburgh sample diagnosed with BD1 vs. the population in general, significant differences were detected. More... | Positive | |
rs10462020 | PER3 | T/G | TDT P-value = 0.784 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.07 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs10462021 | PER3 | C/T | TDT P-value = 0.68 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.281 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs2279665 | TIMELESS | G/C | TDT P-value = 0.047, X2=7.00, df=1 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.717 for BDI | We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed t...... We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed transmission distortion of the bipolar samples jointly More... | Positive | |
rs228729 | VAMP3 PER3 | C/T | TDT P-value = 0.836 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.08 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs2278749 | ARNTL | C/T | TDT P-value = 0.162 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.161 for BDI | The loci tested did not show significant differences between...... The loci tested did not show significant differences between sites in the transmission rate. More... | Negative | |
rs2279287 | ARNTL | A/G | TDT P-value = 0.322, X2=3.92, df=1 in the samples combined, Pittsburgh Trends test=0.056 for BDI | We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed t...... We observed significant transmission bias when we analyzed transmission distortion of the bipolar samples jointly More... | Positive |
Markers | Haplotype | Related Gene(s)/Region(s) | Statistical Values | Author Comments | Result Category |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs1982350 - rs2896635 - rs2278749 - rs969486 - rs2290035 | ARNTL | global tests, P-value = 0.61, X<sup>2</sup>=9.18, df=11 | For ARNTL, these analyses revealed over-transmission of hapl...... For ARNTL, these analyses revealed over-transmission of haplotypes encompassing five SNPs rs1982350, rs2896635, rs2278749, rs969486 and rs2290035. However, global tests of haplotypes involving these SNPs revealed no significant association. More... | Positive | |
rs2279665 - rs774026 - rs2291738 - rs2291739 | TIMELESS | global tests, P-value = 0.02, X<sup>2</sup>=9.62, df=3 | For TIMELESS, these analyses revealed over-transmission of h...... For TIMELESS, these analyses revealed over-transmission of haplotypes encompassing four SNPs rs2279665, rs774026, rs2291738 and rs2291739. Global tests of haplotypes involving these SNPs revealed a significant association. More... | Positive |
Gene | Statistical Values/Author Comments | Result Category |
---|---|---|
PER1 | Significant association was detected (P<0.05) with Pittsburgh BD1 using CC test, but no significa...... Significant association was detected (P<0.05) with Pittsburgh BD1 using CC test, but no significant association was detected in BD1 using TDT test. More... | Positive |
PER3 | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
ARNTL | Significant association was detected (P<0.05) with Pittsburgh BD1 using CC test and BD1 using TDT...... Significant association was detected (P<0.05) with Pittsburgh BD1 using CC test and BD1 using TDT test. More... | Positive |
CLOCK | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
CRY2 | No significant association was detected with Pittsburgh BD1 using CC test, but significant associati...... No significant association was detected with Pittsburgh BD1 using CC test, but significant association (P<0.05) was detected in BD1 using TDT test. More... | Positive |
PER2 | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
TIMELESS | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
CRY1 | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
Disease | SNP | Related Gene(s) | Statistical Values | Description | Result Category |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZ | rs228729 | VAMP3 PER3 | TDT P-value = 0.914, Trends test=0.028 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs2290035 | BTBD10 ARNTL | TDT P-value = 0.935, Trends test=0.689 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs895682 | ARNTL | TDT P-value = 0.697, Trends test=0.846 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs2279287 | ARNTL | TDT P-value = 0.348, Trends test=0.173 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs969486 | ARNTL | not analyzed for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs2279665 | TIMELESS | not analyzed for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs7107287 | ARNTL | not analyzed for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs2859387 | PER3 | TDT P-value = 0.02, X2=5.36, df=1, Trends test=0.168 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | When we analyzed transmission bias in the SZ/SZA samples, we observed significant transmission distortion at this loci. | Positive |
SZ | rs774026 | TIMELESS | TDT P-value = 0.039, X2=4.25, df=1, Trends test=0.352 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | When we analyzed transmission bias in the SZ/SZA samples, we observed significant transmission distortion at this loci. | Positive |
SZ | rs2896635 | ARNTL | TDT P-value = 0.933, Trends test=0.772 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs4757142 | ARNTL | not analyzed for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs2291738 | TIMELESS | TDT P-value = 0.126, Trends test=0.256 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs4908699 | PER3 UTS2 | TDT P-value = 0.352, Trends test=0.161 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs2291739 | TIMELESS ARHGEF5 | not analyzed for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs10462018 | PER3 | TDT P-value = 0.197, Trends test=0.878 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs10462020 | PER3 | TDT P-value = 0.317, Trends test=0.08 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs1982350 | ARNTL | TDT P-value = 0.561, Trends test=0.255 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA; case-control P-value = 0.028, X2=7.137, df=2 when contrasting genotype distributions | Contrasting genotype distributions in cases with the population-based sample did not reveal any significant differences by the trend test, although the genotype distribution for ARNTL rs1982350 was noted to be significantly different. | Positive |
SZ | rs2278749 | ARNTL | not analyzed for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs10462021 | PER3 | TDT P-value = 0.485, Trends test=0.913 for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative | |
SZ | rs1481892 | ARNTL | not analyzed for Pittsburgh SZ/SZA | Negative |
Disease | Gene | Description | Result Category |
---|---|---|---|
SZ | CLOCK | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
SZ | ARNTL | No significant association was detected with SZ/SZA using either CC test or TDT test. | Negative |
SZ | PER2 | Negative | |
SZ | PER1 | Significant association was detected (P<0.05) with SZ/SZA using both CC test and TDT test. | Positive |
SZ | PER3 | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
SZ | TIMELESS | No significant association was detected in any sample using any test. | Negative |
SZ | CRY2 | No significant association was detected with SZ/SZA using CC test, but significant association (P<0.05) was detected using TDT test. | Positive |
Copyright: Bioinformatics Lab, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Feedback
Acknowledgements
To view this website normally, please make sure to allow Flash to run from the local filesystem in the security settings panel.
Last update: March 31, 2016