
Search SNP
Search Gene
Search CNV
Search Haplotype
Search Other Variant
Search Region
Search Pathway
Search Study
Gene Report
Basic information | Related studies | Functional annotation | Related other genetic factors | Overlap with SZ and MDD | ADD to My Gene Set | Comment on Gene | View All Comments on Gene |
Approved Symbol | COMT |
---|---|
Approved Name | catechol-O-methyltransferase |
Location | 22q11.21 |
Position | chr22:19941607-19969975, 1 |
External Links |
HGNC: 2228 Entrez Gene: 1312 Ensembl: ENSG00000093010 UCSC: uc002zqu.3 |
No. of Studies | 28 (Positive: 14; Negative: 14; trend: 0) |
Overlap with SZ? | YES |
Overlap with MDD? | YES |
Reference | Tested Markers | Statistical Values/Author Comments | Result Category | Comment on Study |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lachman, H. M., 1997 | These data suggest that COMT is not a significant susceptibility gene in BPD occuring in the general population, in contrast with VCFS patient. | Negative | Comment on Study | |
Hukic, D. S.,2013 | SNP: rs5993883, rs165599 | Our finding are consistent with other studies showing genetic associations between the COMT and DAOA genes and impaired cognition both in psychiatric disorders and in the general population. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Mynett-Johnson, L. A., 1998 | Other variant: COMT_H/L | Tests comparing transmitted and non-transmitted alleles provide no evidence that the polymorphism contributes to a susceptibility to bipolar disorder within the sample as a whole. However, amongst female bipolar I probands (n = 30) there was a tendency for the low-activity allele of COMT to be preferentially transmitted. Furthermore, a re-examination of an Irish case-control sample resulted in a similar observation amongst female bipolar I sufferers and pooling the data sets strengthened the findings. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Pandolfo, G., 2015 | Other variant: COMT_G1947A, COMT_C1886G | This work first showed the association of combined Leu136Leu and Val158Met variants of COMT gene with MDD and BD. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Li, T., 1997 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met, COMT_Codon108/158 | We hypothesize that either the low activity allele of catechol-O-methyltransferase is a risk factor for bipolar affective disorder in Chinese populations or is in linkage disequilibrium with a nearby susceptibility gene or polymorphism. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Wang, L. J., 2015 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | Our findings support preliminary evidence that the COMT and MTHFR genes interact in BP-II, and they imply the connection of both dopaminergic pathways and methylation pathways in the pathogenesis of BP-II. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant interaction effect of the COMT Val158Met Val/Val genotype and the MTHFR C677T C/T + T/T genotype for the protective effect on the odds of developing BP-II. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Lee, H. Y.,2010 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | No statistically significant difference in genotype distribution was found between manic patients and normal controls. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Massat, I.,2011 | SNP: rs165599, rs2075507, rs4633, rs4680, rs4818, rs6269, rs737865 | In conclusion, we partially replicated our previous findings confirming a possible influence of COMT variants in MD and BD, particularly in early onset subjects, though not with the same risk genotypes. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Kirov, G.,1999(a) | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | No statistically significant differences were found between transmitted and not transmitted alleles for any of the polymorphisms studied. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Rotondo, A.,2002 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | The findings support the hypothesis that comorbid panic disorder identifies a genetic subtype of bipolar disorder and suggest a role for COMT and 5-HTT in vulnerability to these disorders. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Gutierrez, B.,1997(b) | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met, COMT_C256G | No allelic or genotypic associations were observed.The lack of association suggests that the COMT gene is not a major risk factor for bipolar disorder. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Biomed European Bipolar Collaborative Group,1997 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | We found no evidence of allelic or genotypic association.We can conclude that variation at this functional polymorphism does not make an important contribution to bipolar disorder in the Western European population. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Lee, S. Y.,2012(b) | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | Our findings provide initial evidence that the COMT and BDNF genes interact in bipolar-II without AD. Our findings suggest the involvement of dopaminergic pathway in the pathogenesis of bipolar-II. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Kunugi, H.,1997(b) | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | We conclude that genetic variation that determines high and low activities of COMT does not have a major effect on the vulnerability to affective disorders in our sample. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Dickerson, F. B., 2006 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | COMT Val158Met polymorphism is not associated with bipolar disorder, but affects cognitive functioning in individuals with bipolar disorder. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Burdick, K. E., 2007 | SNP: rs165599, rs737865 Other variant: COMT_Val158Met, COMT_P2 promoter_-278A/G |
A significant association between a single SNP in the COMT gene (rs165599) and BPD I was reported | Positive | Comment on Study |
Serretti, A., 2006 | Other variant: COMT_G/A | COMT variants were not a major liability factor for mood disorder and for mood disorder symptomatology in the present sample | Positive | Comment on Study |
Prata, D. P., 2006 | SNP: rs165599, rs4680, rs737865 | Our work does not support an involvement of RGS4, PRODH, COMTand GRK3 genes in the aetiology of bipolar affective disorder 1 in the Scottish population. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Shifman, S., 2004 | SNP: rs165599, rs4680, rs737865 Haplotype: rs737865 - rs165599(G-G), rs737865 - rs165688 - rs165599(G-G-G) |
the current association between COMT and bipolar disorder is relatively modest | Positive | Comment on Study |
Van Den Bogaert, A., 2006 (b) | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | Together, our data suggest that these functional variants are not involved in the etiology of bipolar disorder in the northern Swedish population nor did gene-gene interaction analysis support a central role of these variants in bipolar disorder.. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Ohara, K., 1998 | Other variant: COMT_H/L | Our results did not suggest the COMTL allele contributed to the etiologies of bipolar disorders. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Kirov, G., 1998 | Other variant: COMT_NlaIII | Our data support the hypothesis that variation in the COMT gene modifies the course of bipolar disorder. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Mick, E.,2009 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | Our study suggests that markers examined thus far in COMT are not associated with pediatric bipolar disorder. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Zhang, Z.,2009(b) | SNP: rs4680 | In conclusion, the low-activity allele (Met) of rs4680 in COMT gene possibly confers risk for bipolar disorder in the Han population, while it needs further evidence for concluding its association with BP in the Caucasian population. | Positive | Comment on Study |
Fallin, M. D.,2005 | 7 SNP typed, Median D'=0.87, Median r<sup>2</sup> =0.36, 3 LD blocks, 0.73 block coverage, all SNP or haplotype P-value > 0.05 in BP and SZ/SZA.. This gene is not suggestive to BP. | Negative | Comment on Study | |
Funke, B.,2005 | SNP: rs165599, rs2097063, rs4680, rs737865 | Our results support the view that COMT variation provides a weak general predisposition to neuropsychiatric disease including psychotic and affective disorders.One variation Val158Met showed a trend towards association in the group of bipolar patients. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Massat, I.,2005 | Other variant: COMT_Val158Met | Results did not show any significant difference when comparing the distribution of genotypes and alleles between BPD patients, EO-BPD patients and control subjects. | Negative | Comment on Study |
Ancin, I.,2011(b) | SNP: rs165599, rs2075507, rs4680 Haplotype: rs2075507 - rs4680 - rs165599(A-A-G) |
Our results support the association of the COMT gene with BD and with one of its potential endophenotypes, auditory sensory gating deficit, measured by the P50 paradigm. | Positive | Comment on Study |
GO terms by PBA (count: 6)

ID | Name | Type | Evidence[PMID] | No. of Genes in BDgene |
---|---|---|---|---|
GO:0045211 | postsynaptic membrane | cellular component | IEA | 68 |
GO:0016021 | integral component of membrane | cellular component | IEA | 219 |
GO:0007565 | female pregnancy | biological process | IEA | 15 |
GO:0005886 | plasma membrane | cellular component | TAS | 360 |
GO:0007268 | synaptic transmission | biological process | TAS | 116 |
GO:0016020 | membrane | cellular component | IDA[19946888] | 137 |
GO terms by database search (count: 31)

KEGG pathways by PBA (count: 0)
KEGG pathways by database search (count: 1)

ID | Name | No. of Genes in BDgene | Brief Description |
---|---|---|---|
hsa00350 | Tyrosine metabolism | 8 |
Gene | Interactor | Interactor in BDgene? | Experiment Type | PMID |
---|---|---|---|---|
COMT | ACE | YES | in vivo | 12729939 |
COMT | TRIP13 | NO | yeast 2-hybrid | 16189514 |
COMT | XRN2 | NO | yeast 2-hybrid | 15231747 |
COMT | LITAF | NO | yeast 2-hybrid | 16169070 |
Literature-origin SNPs (count: 9)

rs_ID | Location | Functional Annotation | No. of Studies (Positive/Negative/Trend) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|
rs6269 | chr22:19962429 - 19962429(1) | 5_prime_UTR_variant; intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 1(0/1/0) |
rs165599 | chr22:19969258 - 19969258(1) | 3_prime_UTR_variant; downstream_gene_variant | 7(5/2/0) |
rs2097063 | chr18:73963859 - 73963859(1) | intron_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant | 1(0/1/0) |
rs4633 | chr22:19962712 - 19962712(1) | NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_exon_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; synonymous_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 1(0/1/0) |
rs5993883 | chr22:19950115 - 19950115(1) | intron_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 1(1/0/0) |
rs4818 | chr22:19963684 - 19963684(1) | downstream_gene_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_exon_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; synonymous_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 1(0/1/0) |
rs737865 | chr22:19942598 - 19942598(1) | intron_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 5(2/3/0) |
rs4680 | chr22:19963748 - 19963748(1) | downstream_gene_variant; missense_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_exon_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 6(3/3/0) |
rs2075507 | chr22:19940569 - 19940569(1) | intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | 2(0/2/0) |
LD-proxies (count: 9)

rs_ID | Literature-origin SNPs with LD | Location | Functional Annotation |
---|---|---|---|
rs737866 | chr22:19942586 - 19942586(1) | intron_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs2020917 | chr22:19941361 - 19941361(1) | intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs8185002 | chr22:19945525 - 19945525(1) | intron_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs740601 | chr22:19963240 - 19963240(1) | downstream_gene_variant; intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs2239393 | chr22:19962905 - 19962905(1) | downstream_gene_variant; intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs165656 | chr22:19961340 - 19961340(1) | intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs9606189 | chr22:19937089 - 19937089(1) | intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs1544325 | chr22:19944145 - 19944145(1) | intron_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant | |
rs5748489 | chr22:19939623 - 19939623(1) | intron_variant; NMD_transcript_variant; non_coding_transcript_variant; upstream_gene_variant |
ID | Location | Size | Band | Type | Inheritance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNV_Zhang[2009]_306 | chr22:17386126-18691917 (Affymetrix SNP 6.0 array reference genome) | 1305791 | Singleton deletions |
Variant Name | Variant Type | Location in Gene | No. of Studies (Positive/Negative/Trend) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|
COMT_P2 promoter_-278A/G | point mutation | P2 promoter | 1 (0/1/0) |
COMT_NlaIII | point mutation | 1 (1/0/0) | |
COMT_C1886G | point mutation | 1 (1/0/0) | |
COMT_G1947A | point mutation | 1 (0/1/0) | |
COMT_Val158Met | point mutation | 14 (2/12/0) | |
COMT_Codon108/158 | point mutation | 1 (0/1/0) | |
COMT_C256G | SNP | 1 (0/1/0) | |
COMT_H/L | others | 2 (1/1/0) | |
COMT_G/A | point mutation | 1 (1/0/0) |
Region Name | Position | No. of Studies (Positive/Negative/Trend) ![]() |
---|---|---|
22q11 | chr22:15000000-25500000 | 1 (0/1/0) |
22q11.2 | chr22:17400000-25500000 | 2 (0/2/0) |
Chr 22 | chr22:0-50818468 | 2 (0/1/1) |
Overlap with SZ from cross-disorder studies (count: 3)

Reference | Description | Result Category |
---|---|---|
16380905 | This gene is not suggestive to SZ/SZA. | Negative |
16232322 | Our results support the view that COMT variation provides a weak general predisposition to neuropsychiatric disease including psychotic and affective disorders.One SNP also remained significant when only patients with schizophrenia were included. | Positive |
15211633 | previously found to be associated with schizophrenia | Positive |
Overlap with SZ from candidate gene intersection analysis (count: 85)

Reference | ID in SZGene | Result Category |
---|---|---|
15569909 | 420 | Negative |
10581481 | 420 | Negative |
11150892 | 420 | Negative |
17071544 | 420 | Negative |
15572182 | 420 | Negative |
16361958 | 420 | Negative |
8561211 | 420 | Negative |
12815739 | 420 | Positive |
12711403 | 420 | Negative |
19207030 | 420 | Positive |
17716874 | 420 | Negative |
15124004 | 420 | Positive |
19159868 | 420 | Positive |
12842307 | 420 | Negative |
19573260 | 420 | Negative |
16092759 | 420 | Positive |
15645182 | 420 | Positive |
12477929 | 420 | Negative |
16135635 | 420 | Negative |
20016224 | 420 | Positive |
9323320 | 420 | Negative |
12116182 | 420 | Negative |
16094249 | 420 | Negative |
15548428 | 420 | Positive |
20488458 | 420 | Positive |
16330500 | 420 | Negative |
10673772 | 420 | Positive |
12532038 | 420 | Negative |
19077118 | 420 | Positive |
15340358 | 420 | Positive |
12126868 | 420 | Positive |
19369177 | 420 | Positive |
14520117 | 420 | Negative |
18045777 | 420 | Positive |
20102668 | 420 | Negative |
19673036 | 420 | Positive |
12707935 | 420 | Positive |
16860541 | 420 | Negative |
20083391 | 420 | Negative |
16043283 | 420 | Negative |
18164902 | 420 | Negative |
9034544 | 420 | Negative |
19508883 | 420 | Negative |
12842306 | 420 | Negative |
12815736 | 420 | Negative |
18562342 | 420 | Negative |
16380905 | 420 | Negative |
11381111 | 420 | Positive |
15652872 | 420 | Negative |
12082558 | 420 | Negative |
12090821 | 420 | Negative |
15635698 | 420 | Negative |
9532347 | 420 | Negative |
10490696 | 420 | Positive |
15505638 | 420 | Positive |
20206656 | 420 | Negative |
16897602 | 420 | Negative |
16109444 | 420 | Negative |
15567073 | 420 | Negative |
18789857 | 420 | Negative |
12467945 | 420 | Negative |
11705710 | 420 | Negative |
16815691 | 420 | Negative |
16130008 | 420 | Negative |
12497608 | 420 | Negative |
17948281 | 420 | Negative |
8902889 | 420 | Trend |
16232322 | 420 | Positive |
19367610 | 420 | Positive |
11891283 | 420 | Positive |
16741933 | 420 | Negative |
17482701 | 420 | Negative |
20483173 | 420 | Negative |
17427186 | 420 | Negative |
19881467 | 420 | Positive |
18198266 | 420 | Negative |
20605701 | 420 | Positive |
10697824 | 420 | Negative |
15668720 | 420 | Negative |
17006672 | 420 | Positive |
9110105 | 420 | Negative |
19054502 | 420 | Positive |
9535125 | 420 | Positive |
12402217 | 420 | Positive |
10450274 | 420 | Negative |
Overlap with MDD from cross-disorder studies (count: 7)

Reference | Description | Category in MDD |
---|---|---|
15583702 | No association emerged between MDD cases and control subjects.But an association was found between the high-activity COMT Val allele, particularly the COMT Val/Val genotype and EO-MDD. | Negative |
21600957 | In conclusion, we partially replicated our previous findings confirming a possible influence of COMT variants in MD and BD, particularly in early onset subjects, though not with the same risk genotypes. | Positive |
25766270 | This work first showed the association of combined Leu136Leu and Val158Met variants of COMT gene with MDD and BD. | Positive |
16232322 | Our results support the view that COMT variation provides a weak general predisposition to neuropsychiatric disease including psychotic and affective disorders.One SNP was marginally associated in the major depressive group. | Positive |
16969269 | COMT variants were not a major liability factor for mood disorder and for mood disorder symptomatology in the present sample. | Negative |
9270905 | We conclude that genetic variation that determines high and low activities of COMT does not have a major effect on the vulnerability to affective disorders in our sample. | Negative |
9631418 | Our results suggest the COMTL allele contributed to the etiologies of depressive disorders. | Positive |
Overlap with MDD from candidate gene intersection analysis (count: 3)

Reference | Description | Category in MDD | Link in MK4MDD |
---|---|---|---|
16756688 | COMT was associated with depression following exposure to stressors (chi2=13.05, d.f.=2, p=0.0015) and SERTPR also showed a positive association (chi2=6.70, d.f.=2, p=0.035), mainly among women and among major depressives. The interaction between COMT and SERTPR was also significant (p=0.0005). | Pos | COMT |
20828831 | Depressed individuals displayed a higher frequency of the Met/Met and Met/Val genotypes compared to controls (OR=1.49, CI(95%)=1.11-2.00, P=0.009). | Pos | COMT |
20531207 | The combinations of G-T-G-G haplotype for rs6269, rs4633, rs4818 and rs4680 were only present in the MDD group (G-T 4.5%, corrected sim P=0.0001; G-T-G 3.87%, corrected sim P=0.001; G-T-G-G 3.3% corrected sim P=0.0025). | Pos | COMT |
Region: chr22:19941607..19969975 View in gBrowse
Copyright: Bioinformatics Lab, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Feedback
Acknowledgements
To view this website normally, please make sure to allow Flash to run from the local filesystem in the security settings panel.
Last update: March 31, 2016