Markers |
Haplotype |
Related Gene(s)/Region(s) |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 |
T-G-G-C-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.133, genotypic P-value = 0.117 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.525, genotypic P-value = 0.374 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.029, genotypic P-value = 0.022 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.015 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I8+2086 - DAT1_E9+59 - DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 |
G-G-G-A-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.305, genotypic P-value = 0.052 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.152, genotypic P-value = 0.156 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.024, genotypic P-value = 0.055 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.037 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I8+2086 - DAT1_E9+59 - DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 |
A-G-T-G-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.305, genotypic P-value = 0.052 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.152, genotypic P-value = 0.156 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.024, genotypic P-value = 0.055 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.013 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I7+922 - DAT1_I8+2086 - DAT1_E9+59 - DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 |
C-G-G-G-A |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.277, genotypic P-value = 0.04 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.057, genotypic P-value = 0.003 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.0001, genotypic P-value = 0.0003 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.014 in the linked sample
|
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sa......
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 8, 9, and 10 under the genotypewise model. Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model. Similar results were obtained using the allelewise model with empirical P-values of<=0.003 observed for windows 8, 9, 10, 12, and 19.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 |
G-A-T-T-A |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.058, genotypic P-value = 0.176 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.63, genotypic P-value = 0.172 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.039, genotypic P-value = 0.043 in the linked sample; P-value = in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 |
A-G-C-G-A |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.058, genotypic P-value = 0.176 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.63, genotypic P-value = 0.172 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.039, genotypic P-value = 0.043 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.037 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 |
G-G-C-G-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.058, genotypic P-value = 0.176 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.63, genotypic P-value = 0.172 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.039, genotypic P-value = 0.043 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.002 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 |
G-A-G-C-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.133, genotypic P-value = 0.117 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.525, genotypic P-value = 0.374 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.029, genotypic P-value = 0.022 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.037 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_P215 - DAT1_P+2459 - DAT1_I1+1036 - DAT1_I1+1735 - DAT1_I1+1859 |
|
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.187, genotypic P-value = 0.227 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.381, genotypic P-value = 0.408 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.039, genotypic P-value = 0.045 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_P+2459 - DAT1_I1+1036 - DAT1_I1+1735 - DAT1_I1+1859 - DAT1_I1+1860 |
|
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.261, genotypic P-value = 0.513 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.236, genotypic P-value = 0.267 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.047, genotypic P-value = 0.06 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 |
G-C-G-A-A |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.156, genotypic P-value = 0.209 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.777, genotypic P-value = 0.551 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.058, genotypic P-value = 0.06 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.025 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 |
A-T-T-A-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.156, genotypic P-value = 0.209 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.777, genotypic P-value = 0.551 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.058, genotypic P-value = 0.06 in the linked sample; P-value = in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I1+1860 - DAT1_I2+48 - DAT1_I5+448 - DAT1_I6+96 - DAT1_I7+922 |
|
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.341, genotypic P-value = 0.438 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.148, genotypic P-value = 0.492 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.027, genotypic P-value = 0.001 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the UCSD sample also revealed strong evidence of......
Analysis of the UCSD sample also revealed strong evidence of association for window 9, which spans the region between introns 6 and 9, with an empirical P-value < =0.003 under the genotypewise model. Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 |
G-C-G-G-A |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.156, genotypic P-value = 0.209 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.777, genotypic P-value = 0.551 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.058, genotypic P-value = 0.06 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.005 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 |
T-T-A-G-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.362, genotypic P-value = 0.525 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.562, genotypic P-value = 0.506 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.034, genotypic P-value = 0.001 in the linked sample; P-value = in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 - DAT1_E15+352 |
G-G-A-G-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.264, genotypic P-value = 0.029 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.441, genotypic P-value = 0.141 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.012, genotypic P-value = 0.0003 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.055 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 |
C-G-G-A-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.362, genotypic P-value = 0.525 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.562, genotypic P-value = 0.506 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.034, genotypic P-value = 0.001 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.008 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I11+2078 - DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 |
C-G-A-A-C |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.362, genotypic P-value = 0.525 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.562, genotypic P-value = 0.506 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.034, genotypic P-value = 0.001 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.008 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 - DAT1_E15+352 - DAT1_E15VNTR |
|
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.182, genotypic P-value = 0.016 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.134, genotypic P-value = 0.165 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.011, genotypic P-value = 0.004 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 - DAT1_E15+352 - DAT1_E15VNTR - DAT1_E15+1812 |
A-C-G-9-C |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.109, genotypic P-value = 0.019 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.372, genotypic P-value = 0.401 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.0001, genotypic P-value = 0.0004 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.002 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model. Similar results were obtained using the allelewise model with empirical P-values of<=0.003 observed for windows 8, 9, 10, 12, and 19.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 - DAT1_E15+352 |
G-A-A-C-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.264, genotypic P-value = 0.029 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.441, genotypic P-value = 0.141 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.012, genotypic P-value = 0.0003 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.025 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I12+268 - DAT1_I13 - 481 - DAT1_I14+4217 - DAT1_E15+274 - DAT1_E15+352 |
T-A-G-G-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.264, genotypic P-value = 0.029 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.441, genotypic P-value = 0.141 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.012, genotypic P-value = 0.0003 in the linked sample; P-value = in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I6+96 - DAT1_I7+922 - DAT1_I8+2086 - DAT1_E9+59 - DAT1_I9+102 |
G-C-A-G-T |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.411, genotypic P-value = 0.002 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.08, genotypic P-value = 0.001 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.003, genotypic P-value = <0.00001 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.033 in the linked sample
|
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sa......
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 8, 9, and 10 under the genotypewise model. Analysis of the UCSD sample also revealed strong evidence of association for window 9, which spans the region between introns 6 and 9, with an empirical P-value < =0.003 under the genotypewise model. The strongest evidence of association was observed for window 9 (P<0.00001), the window implicated in the analyses of the UCSD and NIMH samples independently. Similar results were obtained using the allelewise model with empirical P-values of<=0.003 observed for windows 8, 9, 10, 12, and 19.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I7+922 - DAT1_I8+2086 - DAT1_E9+59 - DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 |
C-A-G-T-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.277, genotypic P-value = 0.04 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.057, genotypic P-value = 0.003 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.0001, genotypic P-value = 0.0003 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.033 in the linked sample
|
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sa......
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 8, 9, and 10 under the genotypewise model. Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model. Similar results were obtained using the allelewise model with empirical P-values of<=0.003 observed for windows 8, 9, 10, 12, and 19.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I2+48 - DAT1_I5+448 - DAT1_I6+96 - DAT1_I7+922 - DAT1_I8+2086 |
A-G-G-C-A |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.867, genotypic P-value = 0.766 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.308, genotypic P-value = 0.04 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.008, genotypic P-value = 0.029 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.052 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I5+448 - DAT1_I6+96 - DAT1_I7+922 - DAT1_I8+2086 - DAT1_E9+59 |
G-G-C-A-G |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.732, genotypic P-value = 0.286 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.149, genotypic P-value = 0.0001 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.003, genotypic P-value = 0.002 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.033 in the linked sample
|
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sa......
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 8, 9, and 10 under the genotypewise model. Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model. Similar results were obtained using the allelewise model with empirical P-values of<=0.003 observed for windows 8, 9, 10, 12, and 19.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I1+1735 - DAT1_I1+1859 - DAT1_I1+1860 - DAT1_I2+48 - DAT1_I5+448 |
|
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.074, genotypic P-value = 0.102 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.258, genotypic P-value = 0.005 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.305, genotypic P-value = 0.025 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I1+1859 - DAT1_I1+1860 - DAT1_I2+48 - DAT1_I5+448 - DAT1_I6+96 |
|
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.109, genotypic P-value = 0.244 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.048, genotypic P-value = 0.001 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.12, genotypic P-value = 0.001 in the linked sample
|
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sa......
TDT analysis of the sliding window haplotypes in the NIMH sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 8, 9, and 10 under the genotypewise model. Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_E9+59 - DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 |
G-G-A-G-C |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.046, genotypic P-value = 0.02 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.631, genotypic P-value = 0.574 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.003, genotypic P-value = 0.003 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.037 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model. Similar results were obtained using the allelewise model with empirical P-values of<=0.003 observed for windows 8, 9, 10, 12, and 19.
More...
|
Positive
|
DAT1_I1+1036 - DAT1_I1+1735 - DAT1_I1+1859 - DAT1_I1+1860 - DAT1_I2+48 |
|
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.154, genotypic P-value = 0.097 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.096, genotypic P-value = 0.013 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.115, genotypic P-value = 0.258 in the linked sample
|
|
Positive
|
DAT1_E9+59 - DAT1_I9+102 - DAT1_I9 - 21 - DAT1_I10+117 - DAT1_I11+2078 |
G-T-G-G-C |
LMO3
|
allelic P-value = 0.046, genotypic P-value = 0.02 in the UCSD sample, allelic P-value = 0.631, genotypic P-value = 0.574 in the NIMH sample, allelic P-value = 0.003, genotypic P-value = 0.003 in the linked sample; P-value = 0.013 in the linked sample
|
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample reveale......
Analysis of the sliding windows in the Linked sample revealed empirical P-values<=0.003 for windows 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, and 19 under the genotypewise model. Similar results were obtained using the allelewise model with empirical P-values of<=0.003 observed for windows 8, 9, 10, 12, and 19.
More...
|
Positive
|