Search SNP
Search Gene
Search CNV
Search Haplotype
Search Other Variant
Search Region
Search Pathway
Search Study
Study Report
| Comment on Study | View All Comments on Study |
| Reference | Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium,2013 PMID: 23453885 |
|---|---|
| Citation | Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium,(2013). "Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis." Lancet. |
| Disease Type | Bipolar Disorder & Schizophrenia & Major depressive disorder |
| Study Design | case-control |
| Study Type | Genome-wide association study |
| Sample Size | The final dataset consisted of 33 332 cases and 27 888 controls(including pseudocontrols formed from nontransmitted alleles) distributed among the five disorder groups: autism spectrum disorders (4788 trio cases, 4788 trio pseudocontrols, 161 cases, 526 controls), attention defi cit-hyperactivity disorder (1947 trio cases, 1947 trio pseudocontrols, 840 cases, 688 controls), bipolar disorder (6990 cases, 4820 controls), major depressive disorder (9227 cases, 7383 controls), and schizophrenia (9379 cases, 7736 controls). |
| SNP/Region/Marker Size | 1 250 922 SNPs |
| Predominant Ethnicity | Caucasian |
| Population | European |
| Sample Diagnosis | DSM-IV |
|---|---|
| Sample Status | The sample for these analyses consisted of cases, controls, and family-based samples assembled for previous genome-wide PGC mega-analyses of individuallevel data.Cases and controls were not related. For the family-based samples, we matched alleles transmitted to aff ected off spring (trio cases) with untransmitted alleles (pseudo controls). We estimated the identity-bydescent relation for all pairs of individuals to identify any duplicate individuals in the component datasets. When duplicates were detected, one member of each set was retained. We then randomly allocated these individuals, with a random number generator, to a disorder casecontrol dataset. Sample sizes diff er from previous reports because of this allocation of overlapping individuals. All patients were of European ancestory and met criteria from the DSM third edition revised or fourth edition for the primary disorder of interest. |
| Technique | Genotyping |
| Statistical Method | In the primary analysis, we combined eff ects of each disease analysis by a meta-analytic approach that applied a weighted Z-score,18 in which weights equalled the inverse of the regression coefficient's standard error. This strategy assumed a fixed-effects model, with weights indicating the sample size of the disease-specific studies. In a second analytical approach, we did a five-degree-of freedom test by summing the values for each individual disease meta-analysis. |
| Result Summary | SNPs at four loci surpassed the cutoff for genome-wide significance (p<5x10-8) in the primary analysis: regions on chromosomes 3p21 and 10q24, and SNPs within two L-type voltage-gated calcium channel subunits, CACNA1C and CACNB2. Model selection analysis supported effects of these loci for several disorders. Loci previously associated with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia had variable diagnostic specificity. Polygenic risk scores showed cross-disorder associations, notably between adult-onset disorders. Pathway analysis supported a role for calcium channel signalling genes for all five disorders. Finally, SNPs with evidence of cross-disorder association were enriched for brain eQTL markers. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that specific SNPs are associated with a range of psychiatric disorders of childhood onset or adult onset. In particular, variation in calcium-channel activity genes seems to have pleiotropic effects on psychopathology. These results provide evidence relevant to the goal of moving beyond descriptive syndromes in psychiatry, and towards a nosology informed by disease cause. FUNDING: National Institute of Mental Health. |
| SNP | Related Gene(s) | Allele Change | Risk Allele | Statistical Values | Author Comments | Result Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs11191580 | NT5C2 | T/C | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000111 when five disorders were combined. | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analy...... Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. More... | Positive | |
| rs12966547 | CCDC68 | G/A | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000026 when BPD,MDD and SZ were combined. | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analy...... Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. More... | Positive | |
| rs12576775 | TENM4 | G/A | Association analysis:P-value = 0.000000044 in BPD. | Significant association was observed in BPD. Significant association was observed in BPD. | Positive | |
| rs4765914 | CACNA1C | T/C | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000152 when BPD,MDD and SZ were combined. | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analy...... Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. More... | Positive | |
| rs1024582 | CACNA1C CACNA1C-IT3 | A/G | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000187,OR(95%CI) = 1.07(1.05-1.10) when BD and SZ were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analy...... Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. More... | Positive | |
| rs2799573 | CACNB2 | T/C | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000429,OR(95%CI) = 1.08(1.05-1.12) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analy...... Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. More... | Positive | |
| rs9371601 | SYNE1 | T/G | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000427 in BPD. | Significant association was observed in BPD. Significant association was observed in BPD. | Positive | |
| rs10994397 | ANK3 | T/C | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000708 in BPD. | Significant association was observed in BPD. Significant association was observed in BPD. | Positive | |
| rs2535629 | ITIH3 | G/A | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000000254,OR(95%CI) = 1.1(1.07–1.12) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analy...... Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. More... | Positive | |
| rs11191454 | AS3MT | A/G | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000139,OR(95%CI) = 1.13(1.08–1.18) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analy...... Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. More... | Positive |
| Gene | Statistical Values/Author Comments | Result Category |
|---|---|---|
| TENM4 | Significant association was observed in BPD. Significant association was observed in BPD. | Positive |
| ITIH3 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| CCDC68 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| CACNA1C | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SYNE1 | Significant association was observed in BPD. Significant association was observed in BPD. | Positive |
| ANK3 | Significant association was observed in BPD. Significant association was observed in BPD. | Positive |
| CACNB2 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| NT5C2 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| AS3MT | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| Disease | SNP | Related Gene(s) | Statistical Values | Description | Result Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SZ | rs12966547 | CCDC68 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000026 when BPD,MDD and SZ were combined. | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | rs4765914 | CACNA1C | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000152 when BPD,MDD and SZ were combined. | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | rs11191454 | AS3MT | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000139,OR(95%CI) = 1.13(1.08–1.18) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | rs2535629 | ITIH3 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000000254,OR(95%CI) = 1.1(1.07–1.12) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | rs2799573 | CACNB2 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000429,OR(95%CI) = 1.08(1.05-1.12) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | rs1024582 | CACNA1C CACNA1C-IT3 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000187,OR(95%CI) = 1.07(1.05-1.10) when BD and SZ were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | rs12966547 | CCDC68 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000026 when BPD,MDD and SZ were combined. | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | rs4765914 | CACNA1C | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000152 when BPD,MDD and SZ were combined. | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | rs11191454 | AS3MT | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000139,OR(95%CI) = 1.13(1.08–1.18) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | rs2535629 | ITIH3 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.00000000000254,OR(95%CI) = 1.1(1.07–1.12) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | rs2799573 | CACNB2 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000429,OR(95%CI) = 1.08(1.05-1.12) when five disorders were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | rs1024582 | CACNA1C CACNA1C-IT3 | Association analysis:P-value = 0.0000000187,OR(95%CI) = 1.07(1.05-1.10) when BD and SZ were combined | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| Disease | Gene | Description | Result Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| SZ | AS3MT | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | ANK3 | ||
| SZ | SYNE1 | ||
| SZ | CACNB2 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | CACNA1C | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | NT5C2 | ||
| SZ | ITIH3 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | CCDC68 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| SZ | TENM4 | ||
| MDD | AS3MT | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | ANK3 | ||
| MDD | ITIH3 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | SYNE1 | ||
| MDD | CCDC68 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | TENM4 | ||
| MDD | CACNB2 | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | CACNA1C | Significant association was observed in cross-disorder analysis. | Positive |
| MDD | NT5C2 |
Copyright: Bioinformatics Lab, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Feedback
Acknowledgements
To view this website normally, please make sure to allow Flash to run from the local filesystem in the security settings panel.
Last update: March 31, 2016


