Search SNP
Search Gene
Search CNV
Search Haplotype
Search Other Variant
Search Region
Search Pathway
Search Study
Study Report
| Comment on Study | View All Comments on Study |
| Reference | Zhao, T.,2009 PMID: 19448850 |
|---|---|
| Citation | Zhao, T., Y. Liu, et al. (2009). Positive association between the PDLIM5 gene and bipolar disorder in the Chinese Han population. J Psychiatry Neurosci 34(3): 199-204. |
| Disease Type | Bipolar Disorder |
| Study Design | case-control |
| Study Type | Candidate-gene association study |
| Sample Size | 502 patients with bipolar disorder and 507 controls |
| SNP/Region/Marker Size | 4 SNPs |
| Predominant Ethnicity | Mongloid |
| Population | Chinese |
| Gender | 281 men and 221 women in patients and 287 men and 220 women in controls |
| Age Group | Adults : The mean age of patients was 37.82 (standard deviation [SD] 12.69) years, and the average age at onset of disease was 26.76 (SD 10.57) years. The mean age of controls was 36.29 (SD 7.23) years. |
| Sample Diagnosis | DSM |
|---|---|
| Sample Status | We recruited unrelated inpatients with bipolar disorder from Anhui Province, China. Bipolar disorder had been diagnosed according to DSM-IV19 criteria. Two senior psychiatrists independently reviewed the diagnoses and psychiatric records.We recruited unrelated controls without major mental illness from the same geographic region as the patients. All participants were Chinese Han. We obtained written informed consent from all participants, and the Shanghai Ethical Committee of Human Genetic Resources reviewed and approved our study. |
| Technique | genotyping |
| Statistical Method | We conducted Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tests, allele and genotype frequency analysis online on a robust and userfriendly software platform (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/) developed by our laboratory. We estimated linkage disequilibrium measured with standardized D', and we compared the discrepancies of allele and genotype frequencies on single loci between patients and controls using a Monte Carlo simulation strategy,a X2 test and odds ratios (ORs). We used Bonferroni correction for multiple tests of all SNPs and haplotypes in patients and controls. We performed post hoc power calculations with pre-established alpha error probability, sample size and effect size using the G*Power program.22 All reported p values are 2-tailed. We set statistical significance at p < 0.05. |
| Result Summary | RESULTS: We found that rs2433322 showed significantly different frequencies between patients and controls (p = 0.002). Three of the SNPs, rs10008257, rs2433320 and rs2438146, showed no statistical association with bipolar disorder; however, haplotypes constructed from 3 SNPs, rs2433320, rs2433322 and rs2438146, were significantly associated with bipolar disorder (global p = 0.004 after Bonferroni correction). LIMITATIONS: Our genetic association study only offered evidence for susceptibility of PDLIM5 to bipolar disorder, but the positive SNP rs2433322 could not indicate a direct cause of this complicated brain disorder. In addition, the 4 tagged SNPs that we selected could not cover the whole region of PDLIM5, thus additional reproducible studies of more SNPS in large non-Asian populations are needed. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PDLIM5 might play a role in susceptibility to bipolar disorder among the Chinese Han population. |
| SNP | Related Gene(s) | Allele Change | Risk Allele | Statistical Values | Author Comments | Result Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2438146 | PDLIM5 | G/T | Allelic association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.23, OR (95% CI)=1.18(0.90-1.53); among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.24, OR (95% CI)=1.18(0.90-1.55). Genotypic Association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.35; among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.33 | No significant association was observed No significant association was observed | Negative | |
| rs2433322 | PDLIM5 | A/G | Allelic association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.002, OR (95% CI)=1.51(1.17-1.97); among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.002, OR (95% CI)=1.52(1.16-1.20). Genotypic Association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.01; among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.013 | Significant association was observed in both BP and BPI. Significant association was observed in both BP and BPI. | Positive | |
| rs10008257 | PDLIM5 | A/G | Allelic association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.19, OR (95% CI)=1.13(0.94-1.36); among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.18, OR (95% CI)=1.14(0.94-1.38). Genotypic Association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.41; among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.38 | No significant association was observed No significant association was observed | Negative | |
| rs2433320 | PDLIM5 | A/G | Allelic association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.44, OR (95% CI)=1.10(0.86-1.41); among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.28, OR (95% CI)=1.15(0.89-1.49). Genotypic Association: among patients and controls, P-value = 0.45; among patients with bipolar disorder I and controls, P-value = 0.25 | No significant association was observed No significant association was observed | Negative |
| Markers | Haplotype | Related Gene(s)/Region(s) | Statistical Values | Author Comments | Result Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 - rs2438146 | G-A-C | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.004(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value = 0.01, OR (95% CI)=0.68(0.51-0.91) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 - rs2438146 | G-G-C | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.004(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value < 0.001, Individual P-value = 0.001(after Bonferroni correction), OR (95% CI)=8.27(2.55-26.79) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| rs2433322 - rs2438146 | A-C | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.010(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value = 0.003, OR (95% CI)=0.67(0.51-0.87) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| rs2433322 - rs2438146 | G-C | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.006(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value < 0.001, Individual P-value = 0.005(after Bonferroni correction), OR (95% CI)=2.95(1.68-5.20) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.58 | No significant association was found . No significant association was found . | Negative | |
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 | A-A-G | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.045(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value = 0.031, OR (95% CI)=1.92(1.05-3.50) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 | G-G-A | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.045(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value = 0.035, OR (95% CI)=0.81(0.67-0.99) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 | G-G-G | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.045(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value < 0.001, Individual P-value = 0.029(after Bonferroni correction), OR (95% CI)=4.4(1.76-11.04) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 - rs2438146 | A-A-G-T | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.21(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value = 0.05, OR (95% CI)=1.8(0.99-3.29) | Significant association was found in individual P-value. Significant association was found in individual P-value. | Positive |
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 | A-A | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.006(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value = 0.05, OR (95% CI)=0.53(0.28-1.01) | Significant association was found in global P-value. Significant association was found in global P-value. | Positive |
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 | G-A | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.006(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value = 0.029, OR (95% CI)=0.76(0.59-0.97) | Significant association was found in global P-value. Significant association was found in global P-value. | Positive |
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 | G-G | PDLIM5 | Haplotypic association:Global P-value = 0.006(after Bonferroni correction), Individual P-value < 0.001, Individual P-value = 0.007(after Bonferroni correction), OR (95% CI)=3.95(1.85-8.44) | Significant association was found in global P-value and indi...... Significant association was found in global P-value and individual P-value. More... | Positive |
| Gene | Statistical Values/Author Comments | Result Category |
|---|---|---|
| PDLIM5 | In conclusion, our case-control study provided consistent evidence that PDLIM5 might play a potentia...... In conclusion, our case-control study provided consistent evidence that PDLIM5 might play a potential role in the susceptibility to bipolar disorder in the Chinese Han population. More... | Positive |
Copyright: Bioinformatics Lab, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Feedback
Acknowledgements
To view this website normally, please make sure to allow Flash to run from the local filesystem in the security settings panel.
Last update: March 31, 2016


