Study Report

Basic Info
| Reference |
Squassina, A.,2009 PMID: 19308020
|
| Citation |
Squassina, A., M. Manchia, et al. (2009). The diacylglycerol kinase eta gene and bipolar disorder: a replication study in a Sardinian sample. Mol Psychiatry 14(4): 350-351.
|
| Disease Type |
Bipolar I Disorder |
| Study Design |
case-control |
| Study Type |
Candidate-gene association study |
| Sample Size |
197 BDI patients and 300 healthy controls |
| SNP/Region/Marker Size |
3 SNPs |
| Predominant Ethnicity |
Caucasian |
| Population |
Sardinian |
| Gender |
85 men and 112 women in cases and 144 men and 155 women in controls |
| Age Group |
Adults
:
Mean age(SD)(year):43.0(14.8) in cases and 42(12) in controls
|

Detail Info
| Sample Diagnosis |
RDC |
| Sample Status |
Response to lithium was assessed using the scale developed by Grof et al.4 Briefly, the scale measures the degree of improvement in the course of the treatment (criterion A) and weighs clinical factors considered relevant in determining whether the improvement observed is due to the lithium treatment(criteria B1-B5). The total score (TS), obtained by subtracting score B from score A, allows us to identify the phenotype of the full response to lithium therapy (TSX7 = full responders; TSp0.6 = others). A total of 91 patients out of 197 were eligible for the study (mean age 46.9,SD=15.0 years; mean age at onset 27.7,SD=15.011.5 years; 32 men and 59 women). |
| Technique |
genotyping |
| Statistical Method |
Single-marker and haplotype association was carried out using Haploview. |
| Result Summary |
None of SNPs tested showed association.We showed association for the most common haplotype (H2) that remained significant after the permutation test (P = 0.006; permutation P= 0.025).Our study does not replicate the single-marker association reported by Baum et al.3 However, the significant association for haplotype H2 may reflect the presence of other markers in LD with the block.In conclusion, the association for a DGKH haplotype reported in our sample, although intriguing, must be interpreted with caution and further studies need to be performed to clarify the role of DGKH in BD. |

SNPs reported by this study for BD (count: 3)
| SNP |
Related Gene(s) |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
| rs1012053 |
DGKH
|
|
A |
Alelle association: P-value = 0.881permutation P-value = 1
|
No significant association was observed
No significant association was observed
|
Negative
|
| rs9315885 |
DGKH
MAPK6PS3
|
|
T |
Alelle association: P-value = 0.035permutation P-value = 0.073
|
No significant association was observed
No significant association was observed
|
Negative
|
| rs1170191 |
DGKH
|
|
C |
Alelle association: P-value = 0.312permutation P-value = 0.551
|
No significant association was observed
No significant association was observed
|
Negative
|

Haplotypes reported by this study for BD (count: 4)
| Markers |
Haplotype |
Related Gene(s)/Region(s) |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
| rs9315885 - rs1012053 - rs1170191 |
T-A-A |
DGKH
|
Haplotypic association:P-value = 0.024, permutation P-value = 0.11
|
No significant association was found .
No significant association was found .
|
Negative
|
| rs9315885 - rs1012053 - rs1170191 |
C-C-A |
DGKH
|
Haplotypic association:P-value = 0.038, permutation P-value = 0.244
|
No significant association was found .
No significant association was found .
|
Negative
|
| rs9315885 - rs1012053 - rs1170191 |
C-A-C |
DGKH
|
Haplotypic association:P-value = 0.029, permutation P-value = 0.121
|
No significant association was found .
No significant association was found .
|
Negative
|
| rs9315885 - rs1012053 - rs1170191 |
T-A-C |
DGKH
|
Haplotypic association:P-value = 0.006, permutation P-value = 0.025
|
Significant association was found.
Significant association was found.
|
Positive
|

Genes reported by this study for BD (count: 1)
| Gene |
Statistical Values/Author Comments |
Result Category |
| DGKH |
Our study does not replicate the single-marker association reported by Baum et al.However, the signi......
Our study does not replicate the single-marker association reported by Baum et al.However, the significant association for haplotype H2 may reflect the presence of other markers in LD with the block.The association for a DGKH haplotype reported in our sample, although intriguing, must be interpreted with caution and further studies need to be performed to clarify the role of DGKH in BD.
More...
|
Positive
|