Study Report

Basic Info
| Reference |
Squassina, A.,2008 PMID: 18496210
|
| Citation |
Squassina, A., M. Manchia, et al. (2008). "A case-control association study of the PDLIM5 gene and bipolar disorder in a Sardinian sample." Psychiatr Genet 18(3): 128-132.
|
| Disease Type |
Bipolar Disorder |
| Study Design |
case-control |
| Study Type |
Candidate-gene association study |
| Sample Size |
300 BD and 300 controls |
| SNP/Region/Marker Size |
3 SNPs |
| Predominant Ethnicity |
Caucasian |
| Population |
Italian |
| Gender |
BD patients (110 males and 190 females), healthy controls (140 males and 160 females) |
| Age Group |
BD patients: mean age=42.9 (SD=13.8) years; healthy controls: mean age=42.2 (SD=12) years,
|

Detail Info
| Sample Diagnosis |
Research Diagnostic Criteria |
| Sample Status |
Mean age at onset, the time in life when manic or depressive symptoms first occurred, was 25.8 years (SD=10.2). |
| Technique |
PCR and genotyping |
| Statistical Method |
Deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was examined in cases and controls by X2 test. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers was estimated by the standardized Lewontin coefficient (D') and squared correlation (r2). Allelic and genotypic distributions in cases and controls were compared using the X2 and Fisher's exact tests. Haplotype frequencies were estimated by means of the expectation-maximization algorithm. Rare haplotypes with frequency lower than 0.01 were dropped. We carried out a permutation test with 10 000 permutations for evaluating the possible contribution of individual haplotypes to any deviation from the null hypothesis of no association and to obtain a significance value of the applied X2 statistics corrected for multiple comparisons. Statistical tests were carried out using Haploview version 4.0 and Unphased version 3.09. Power analysis was calculated using the 'Power and Sample Size Calculation' program, version 2.1.30. Presuming a frequency of 40% for the risk allele and alpha value of 0.05, our sample had over 80% power to detect association for a susceptibility marker with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.6. |
| Result Summary |
In single-marker analysis, no association was found for any of the SNPs tested. After correction for multiple testing, haplotype analysis showed slight statistically significant association for a rare haplotype of SNPs 1 and 2. Although the findings presented in this paper do not provide strong evidence that the PDLIM5 gene significantly affects the pathophysiology of BD, they suggest that rare variants within the promoter region of the gene may have a marginal effect on the disorder. Further investigation on independent samples and different populations is warranted |

SNPs reported by this study for BD (count: 3)
| SNP |
Related Gene(s) |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
| rs10008257 |
PDLIM5
|
A/G |
|
Allelic P-value = 0.202; OR=1.1; genotypic P-value = 0.436
|
In single-marker analysis, no association was found for any ......
In single-marker analysis, no association was found for any of the SNPs tested.
More...
|
Negative
|
| rs2433320 |
PDLIM5
|
A/G |
|
Allelic P-value = 0.261; OR=1.1; genotypic P-value = 0.055
|
We found an association trend for the genotype GG at this SN......
We found an association trend for the genotype GG at this SNP, with higher frequency in BD than in controls.
More...
|
Negative
|
| rs2433322 |
PDLIM5
|
A/G |
|
Allelic P-value = 0.288; OR=1.1; genotypic P-value = 0.068
|
In single-marker analysis, no association was found for any ......
In single-marker analysis, no association was found for any of the SNPs tested.
More...
|
Negative
|

Haplotypes reported by this study for BD (count: 13)
| Markers |
Haplotype |
Related Gene(s)/Region(s) |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 |
|
PDLIM5
|
Global P-value = 0.025
|
We found weak association for haplotypes of SNP1-SNP2. Not s......
We found weak association for haplotypes of SNP1-SNP2. Not significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
More...
|
Positive
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 |
A-G |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=0.49; P-value = 0.48
|
|
Negative
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 |
A-A |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=3.96; P-value = 0.047
|
Not significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
Not significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
|
Negative
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 |
G-G |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=0.34; P-value = 0.56
|
|
Negative
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 |
G-A |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=6.84; P-value = 0.009; corrected P-value = 0.040 after permutation test (10 000 permutations).
|
The most significant P value was obtained for the rare haplo......
The most significant P value was obtained for the rare haplotype G-A of SNPs 1 and 2.
More...
|
Positive
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
A-A-G |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=3.98; P-value = 0.047
|
The most common haplotype A-A-G was more highly represented ......
The most common haplotype A-A-G was more highly represented in the control group.
More...
|
Negative
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
|
PDLIM5
|
Global P-value = 0.033
|
Haplotype analysis showed slight statistical association for......
Haplotype analysis showed slight statistical association for the three SNP haplotypes. Not significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
More...
|
Positive
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
G-A-G |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=5.94; P-value = 0.013
|
Not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. T......
Not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. The rare haplotype G-A-G was more frequent in the BD group.
More...
|
Positive
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
A-G-A |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=0.39; P-value = 0.54
|
|
Negative
|
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
|
PDLIM5
|
Global P-value = 0.255
|
No association was found
No association was found
|
Negative
|
| rs10008257 - rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
G-G-A |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=0.34; P-value = 0.56
|
|
Negative
|
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
G-A |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=1.18; P-value = 0.28
|
|
Negative
|
| rs2433320 - rs2433322 |
A-G |
PDLIM5
|
X<sup>2</sup>=1.45; P-value = 0.23
|
|
Negative
|

Genes reported by this study for BD (count: 1)
| Gene |
Statistical Values/Author Comments |
Result Category |
| PDLIM5 |
In single-marker analysis, no association was found for any of the SNPs tested. After correction for multiple testing, haplotype analysis showed slight statistically significant association for a rare haplotype of SNPs 1 and 2, P-value = 0.009; corrected P-value = 0.040 .
Although the findings presented in this paper do not provide strong evidence that the PDLIM5 gene si......
Although the findings presented in this paper do not provide strong evidence that the PDLIM5 gene significantly affects the pathophysiology of BD, they suggest that rare variants within the promoter region of the gene may have a marginal effect on the disorder.
More...
|
Positive
|