Study Report

Basic Info
| Reference |
Austin, J.,2000 PMID: 10909129
|
| Citation |
Austin, J., B. Hoogendoorn, et al. (2000). "Association analysis of the proneurotensin gene and bipolar disorder." Psychiatr Genet 10(1): 51-54.
|
| Disease Type |
Bipolar I Disorder |
| Study Design |
case-control |
| Study Type |
Candidate-gene association study |
| Sample Size |
219 bipolar probands and 219 control probands |
| SNP/Region/Marker Size |
3 variants |
| Predominant Ethnicity |
Caucasian |
| Population |
British |
| Gender |
42% male |
| Age Group |
Adults
:
Mean age(SD)(year):45.7(13.3) in BD probands and 44.0(9.7) for controls in main association sample ;50(43) in BD probands and 48(18) for controls in replication sample
|

Detail Info
| Sample Diagnosis |
DSM |
| Sample Status |
All subjects were Caucasians born in the UK or Eire.The main association sample were recruited from psychiatric outpatient clinics in England and Wales.Fifty-eight subjects had a family history of affective disorder in a first degree relative.Controls were group matched for age,sex and ethnicity from more than 700 blood donors recruited from the local branch of the National Blood Transfusion Service(Wales).In order to further investigate findings exceeding conventional levels of ststistical significance,we used a repliacation sample comprising a further 105 probans recuited from psychiatric out-patient clinics in England and Wales and 110 comparison individuals who were attending a family medical practitioner in South Wales for non-psychiatric reasons. |
| Replication Size |
105 bipolar probands and 110 control probands |
| Technique |
PCR and DHPLC |
| Statistical Method |
X2 test |
| Result Summary |
These have now been tested for association with bipolar disorder using a case-control sample of unrelated bipolar subjects and matched controls. No evidence for association was found, and our data therefore suggest that sequence variation in this gene does not make an important contribution to susceptibility to bipolar disorder. |

Haplotypes reported by this study for BD (count: 1)
| Markers |
Haplotype |
Related Gene(s)/Region(s) |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
| (NTS_3A>G) - (NTS_166C>G) |
|
NTS
|
Haplotypic association:X<sup>2</sup> =1.96; df=3; P-value = 0.58
|
No significant association was found .
No significant association was found .
|
Negative
|

Other variants reported by this study for BD (count: 2)
| Variant Name |
Related Gene |
Type |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
| NTS 3A>G |
NTS |
point mutation |
A>G |
|
Association analysis:allele, X2 = 0.51; df=1; P-value = 0.48;genotype, X2 = 6.17; df=2; P-value = 0.046, in full samples, X2 = 4.43; df=2; P-value = 0.11
|
Significant associations were found in genotypic frequencies......
Significant associations were found in genotypic frequencies.
More...
|
Positive
|
| NTS 166C>G |
NTS |
point mutation |
C>G |
|
Association analysis:allele, X2 = 0.89; df=1; P-value = 0.35;genotype, X2 = 0.93; df=2; P-value = 0.63
|
No significant association was observed.
No significant association was observed.
|
Negative
|

Genes reported by this study for BD (count: 1)
| Gene |
Statistical Values/Author Comments |
Result Category |
| NTS |
No evidence for association was found, and our data therefore suggest that sequence variation in thi......
No evidence for association was found, and our data therefore suggest that sequence variation in this gene does not make an important contribution to susceptibility to bipolar disorder.
More...
|
Negative
|