Study Report

Basic Info
| Reference |
Goes, F. S.,2011 PMID: 21637803
|
| Citation |
Goes, F. S., M. Rongione, et al. (2011). "Exonic DNA sequencing of ERBB4 in bipolar disorder." PLoS One 6(5): e20242.
|
| Disease Type |
Bipolar Disorder |
| Study Design |
case-control |
| Study Type |
Candidate-gene association study |
| Sample Size |
1,001 BP cases and 1,033 controls |
| SNP/Region/Marker Size |
2 variants |
| Predominant Ethnicity |
Caucasian |
| Population |
American |

Detail Info
| Sample Diagnosis |
DSM |
| Sample Status |
Cases were selected from the 1,001 BP cases and 1,033 controls of European-American descent genotyped through the GAIN consortium by the Bipolar Genome Study (BiGS). All cases were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) and best-estimate diagnoses were made by two research psychiatrists or PhD psychologists. Among the BP cases, we initially selected for sequencing the 189 subjects from the GAIN BP sample who had a lifetime history of moodincongruent psychosis as previously defined. Briefly, subjects were classified as cases with mood-incongruent psychotic bipolar disorder if they had a lifetime history of running commentary auditory hallucinations, or passivity delusions such as delusions of being controlled, or delusions of thought insertion, withdrawal, or broadcasting. Subjects were also included if their psychotic symptoms during their most severe depression or mania were judged by the interviewer to be inconsistent with typical depressive or manic themes. Of the 189 subjects, one subject was sequenced in duplicate, and DNA for one subject was unavailable, leading to a final count of 188 subjects sequenced across the ERBB4 gene. In our association study we genotyped all 189 cases as well as 810 non mood-incongruent BP cases and 999 healthy controls from the GAIN BP consortium sample. These controls were previously ascertained using an Internet based adaption of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short Form (CIDISF). Controls were selected to have no self-reported history of hallucinations, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia, and no history of sufficient lifetime depressive symptoms to meet DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. |
| Technique |
genotyping |
| Statistical Method |
Based on a scree plot, we selected the top two principal components to include as covariates in our association analysis.We performed association analyses using additive and dominant models. |
| Result Summary |
We genotyped this variant in the GAIN BP case-control samples and found a marginally significant association with mood-incongruent psychotic BP compared with controls (additive model: OR = 1.64, P-value = 0.055; dominant model: OR = 1.73. P-value = 0.039). In conclusion, we found no rare variants of clear deleterious effect, but did uncover a modestly associated novel variant that could affect alternative splicing of ERBB4. However, the modest sample size in this study cannot definitively rule out a role for rare variants in bipolar disorder and studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the observed association. |

Other variants reported by this study for BD (count: 2)
| Variant Name |
Related Gene |
Type |
Allele Change |
Risk Allele |
Statistical Values |
Author Comments |
Result Category |
| ERBB4 SNV7 G>A |
ERBB4 |
point mutation |
G>A |
|
In cases with mood-incongruent psychotic BP compared with controls: in a dominant model(OR = 1.73, P-value = 0.039) and in an additive model (OR= 1.64, P-value = 0.055).
|
Significant associations were found.
Significant associations were found.
|
Positive
|
| ERBB4 SNV8 A insertion/deletion |
ERBB4 |
insertion/deletion |
A insertion/deletion |
|
In case-control:P-value = 0.87
|
No significant association was observed.
No significant association was observed.
|
Negative
|

Genes reported by this study for BD (count: 1)
| Gene |
Statistical Values/Author Comments |
Result Category |
| ERBB4 |
In conclusion, we found no rare variants of clear deleterious effect, but did uncover a modestly ass......
In conclusion, we found no rare variants of clear deleterious effect, but did uncover a modestly associated novel variant that could affect alternative splicing of ERBB4.
More...
|
Positive
|